Workflow / 03.4 Processing

Connect design intent to
process behavior.

Solve steady-state or transient through-thickness process response before structural analysis, using effective ply transport properties, independent top and bottom schedules, cure exotherm, cure-dependent modulus, polymer kinetics, water uptake or release, and process-cycle optimization.

Testing · Virtual Test Lab

Continue the processing workflow with mounted specimens, connected test equipment and calculated response plots. Start with D3039 tension, D7264 flexure, D2344 short-beam screening, or D3518 ±45° shear. Browse all test methods →

Connected model layer

Processing model map

Select a block to explore its theory or workflow. View the complete Model Map

Processing layer of the original master workflow

Equipment is part of the connected study

Pultrusion now uses linked heating and cooling dies with explicit contact intervals. Open the die setup and thermal-contact guide for placement, equations, example settings and limits.

Equipment stays directly below Geometry in CREATE, DISCOVER and SIMULATE. Select reusable lasers, IR/UV lamps, heaters, coolers or molds, then connect them to the applicable thermal boundary. Equipment owns hardware dimensions, power or temperature, contact conductance, vendor and surface-material details; the case owns position, angle, side and exposure timing.

Changing a hardware record updates every boundary using it. Duplicate it first when a change should apply to only one installation. Rollers retain their Geometry records. A convection boundary can remain a prescribed environment without an Equipment record.

Explore the multi-zone pultrusion exercise →Pultrusion workflow with Equipment below Geometry and heater connections to Thermal
Workbench exercise preview

03.62 · Thick laminate: reaction heating, cure gradient and process stress

Level 4
Advanced
Est. 40 min
Physical process schematic · Open full-size schematic ↗
03.62 · Thick laminate: reaction heating, cure gradient and process stress — Surface boundary histories drive heat into and out of the laminate. Compare surface and core histories; include reaction heating only when enabled in the exercise.

Conceptual setup, not a solved result. Use the existing live process view in Workbench to inspect this exercise’s linked equipment, boundary settings and results.

Exercise workflow · Open full-size map ↗

All blocks keep the CREATE / DISCOVER / SIMULATE positions, with Equipment below Geometry; unused records remain disconnected. This changes the view only, not the exercise records.

03.62 · Thick laminate: reaction heating, cure gradient and process stress · Fixed layout with all supplied blocks · not solved results
∑ Used models & submodels

Only models assigned to records used by this exercise are listed here. The full-layout option preserves the supplied starter records; no Workbench records are changed.

Halpin–Tsai · T700 / EP180 UD · Thermal processing

One compatible homogenization model per Micro recipe. Separate recipes compare models; their predictions are not blended.

∑ Theory & assumptions
CLT · Linear static with failure indices · Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping

Shared laminate stiffness drives this membrane/CLT path. Failure criteria are independent comparisons, not blended models. Fatigue is a separate assessment.

∑ Theory & assumptions
1D transient heat transfer · T700 Thermal Process · Thermal laminate warping

Needs linked laminate properties and a compatible process schedule. A linked cycle is not a solved temperature history.

∑ Theory & assumptions
Maximum stress · Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping

Primary ply criterion for Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping. Envelope comparisons are independent; criteria are not blended.

∑ Theory & assumptions
Data travelling between blocks

Micro → Laminates
Predicted ply stiffness, strength, density and expansion properties.

Materials → Micro
Constituent stiffness, strength, density and thermal / moisture properties.

Mechanical → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.

Laminates → Mechanical
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.

Geometry → Mechanical
Part shape and dimensions, thickness or section definition, and model-specific geometric inputs. Each selected case consumes only the dimensions its model supports.

Thermal → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.

Laminates → Thermal
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.

Models → Micro
Applied model assignment: Halpin–Tsai. Model parameters and formulation are used by Micro.

Models → Mechanical
Applied model assignment: CLT · Linear static with failure indices. Model parameters and formulation are used by Mechanical.; Maximum stress

Models → Thermal
Applied model assignment: 1D transient heat transfer. Model parameters and formulation are used by Thermal.

Run the 6 mm laminate through the 120°C dwell with its linked resin reaction heat.

Models: Heat transfer · Classical laminate theory · Extension–bending coupling · Thermomechanical coupling

Study scope and limitations

Teaching inputs, not qualified allowables. Sequential coupling transfers the reported thermal/moisture state to laminate mechanics; it is not simultaneous 3D multiphysics. Inspect the transferred state and reference values before interpreting stress or curvature. Free laminate CLT curvature, not fixture-constrained distortion, a full tool-release simulation or calibrated cure-shrinkage prediction.

03.4 / Workflow focus

Connected engineering record
01

Independent boundary schedules

Thermal and moisture loads each need compatible material properties, a laminate, initial conditions and their own surface schedule.

02

Thermal and moisture formulations

Choose the steady or transient transport model for the study. Transient histories resolve the supported one-dimensional through-thickness problem.

03

Cure, crystallization and UV

Assigned calibrated material laws govern supported polymer-state calculations. UV cure needs its exposure inputs; pultrusion needs the distance/time relationship and pulling speed.

04

Supported coupling

A process schedule alone is not a solved history. Only compatible coupled analyses consume recovered environmental fields; reference-elastic studies remain separate.

05

Tool-release shape

The separate free-release CLT study uses prescribed temperatures and effective shrinkage. It is not a tool-contact simulation or an automatic transfer of the thermal cure history.

06

Process optimization

Compare bounded cycle candidates under supported objectives, save the validation data and rerun the selected candidate.

Use this workflow in Workbench: interactive Blocks, record selections and connection controls →

Connected model layer

Processing · released model connections

Select a model family to follow its inputs, results, theory and exercise. All model families ↗

Follow the connections

Heat, moisture & manufacturing

Inputs

Material laws & boundary cycles

Calibrated kinetics, modulus or transport laws and material assignment

Choose a model family

Transport & reaction

Results / handoff

History & compatible process fields

Material laws consumed by compatible Micro or transport calculations

Representative exercise: this map shows its supplied records and active connections, not every possible configuration of the model family.

Physical process schematic · Open full-size schematic ↗
Cure, crystallization & material transport — Surface boundary histories drive heat into and out of the laminate. Compare surface and core histories; include reaction heating only when enabled in the exercise.

Conceptual setup, not a solved result. Use the existing live process view in Workbench to inspect this exercise’s linked equipment, boundary settings and results.

Exercise workflow · Open full-size map ↗

All blocks keep the CREATE / DISCOVER / SIMULATE positions, with Equipment below Geometry; unused records remain disconnected. This changes the view only, not the exercise records.

Cure, crystallization & material transport · Fixed layout with all supplied blocks · not solved results

Cure, crystallization & material transport

Independent model records can be linked together through material inputs. A saved model must be assigned to a material before it contributes to a simulation.

Model choices and Workbench location

Models → material-model folders · assigned through Materials

  • Kamal–Sourour autocatalytic
  • Kamal–Sourour with diffusion control
  • Nth-order Arrhenius
  • CHILE (degree of cure)
  • UV intensity-dependent cure
  • Nakamura–Avrami
  • Temperature-dependent tabular
  • 1D Fickian diffusion
Next workflow page03.5 Design